The Death and Rebirth of Axiological Determination in The Evolution of Functionalism
Every individual perception represents a distinct prism that challenges the confines of empirical comprehension. Human experience and existence have a philosophical dialectical tension that establishes an inevitable schism between subjective realities and subjunctive possibilities that catalyze the formation of nonreductive naturalism as a priori agencies, which influence and determine individualist ideologies that explicate the acuities of human experiences and the repressive imposition of social determination by avoiding logical reasonings, devoid of rational analysis.
The axioms condense the perennial philosophical quandary surrounding the interactions between individual and social subjectivity and the subjunctive possibilities that confine the agency selected in communal or societal norms necessitates a metaphysical examination into the nature of truth, reason, and the intrinsic tensions between individual agency and social constraints.
The ephemeral nature of our understanding, like wisps of smoke, leaves us longing for a comprehensive understanding of the anomalies of reality. Perilous is the dark unconsciousness where irrational thoughts lie in wait, poised to consume frail comprehensions, which is why metaphysical transcendence is subjective and leads humanity into further plagues of ontological positions such as the seductive draw of solipsism, that extreme loss of self and obligation self and inclination towards subjective seclusion, cognitive dissonance and dissociation.
It infiltrates the collective consciousness like bacteria, replacing nobility with synthetic integrity and contaminating the value of culture.
Oh, the existential plight of man!
His grasp on the understanding of existence is tenuous and fragile. At every turn, the shadows cast illogical reasoning threatening to submerge his well-being and agency. And what of this solipsistic tendency, this deceitful encirclement of subjective cognitive isolation? Additionally, the axiom of logic supports the conjunction of subjunctive and deontic possibilities.
Human existence inevitably rejects logic for natural social adaption, which forms irrational emotions, pleasant and unpleasant, that lead to more negative feelings. This causes humanity to rely on an agency that promises protection and liberty. Yet, this sorrowful state persists, spread by insidious indoctrination and societal and cultural conditioning.
Oh, how tragic it is to witness the crumbling pillars of reason, while the world remains holistically unaware of the dissenting tune of collective delusion.
The reflective implications of humanity’s cyclic and stochastic nature suggest humanity is constantly on the precipice of chaos, yearning for the harmonious union of truth and understanding. Shall we overcome this turmoil of arbitrary perceptions, or succumb to the seductive magnetism of putative dogma?
Only time will disclose the uncertain but probable disastrous destiny that awaits humanity, shattering the eternal struggle between reason and cultural conditioning. The rebirth of axiological determination is facilitated under conscious and unconscious motives. However, it is currently commanded by the domain of an untenable and alternate truth that grows by existing technology and evolutionary patterns.
It is critical to define logic and its theorems to effectively infer from a final provincial capital of relativity and the context in which it occurs from the issues in all its various forms that have been validated throughout evolution, particularly the contention toward the seemingly innocuous subjectivity of any uniform basis.
As a result, the death and rebirth of axiological determination can contextualize social functionalism and the advantages and disadvantages of supporting its proliferation. This depends on the role played by each generation in a rapidly increasing population at the pinnacle of technological advancement.
The capacity to comply with the strict confines of applied logic permits the freedom to induct and deduct probability so that reliable conclusions ultimately direct an empirical and logical perception of reality for each individual despite each experiencing it differently. It is a paradoxical continuum guided by evolution, as it always will be due to the death and rebirth of axiological determination.
This observable metacognition is humanity’s penchant for curiosity and comprehension of intrinsic value showing how functionalism is as vastly complex as an expanding knowledge or lack thereof from its evolution.
Sapience and sentience construct the observable constants of reality for all humans — axioms of the abstractions and provinces of existence that allow versatility to act as stark contrasts to one another, as well as the ability to function together in the operation of a developmental cognition in humanity’s expansion of this knowledge.
Deviating from these constants has a deleterious impact on establishing a reality capable of demonstrating. It allows misconceptions and pretenses to be accepted as a priori of societal subjectivity while objectivity loses meaning because external authority influences observable merit. However, despite their irrationality and the perception that limits rationale, they are well supported by those who discard their agency for a false one made of propaganda.
